| |
Date |
File |
Description |
|
| |
04/2006 |
Publication |
|
|
| |
09/30/2006 |
Dissertation |
[pdf] [MS word document] |
|
| |
09/23/2005 |
Ph. D. defense |
|
|
| |
08/20/2004 |
Cox_vs_Raubenheimer1.doc |
Document for method coparison between Cox and Raubenheimer
to etimate bottom friction coefficient, turbulent dissipation and production |
|
| |
08/12/2004 |
rev_raubeheimer04.ppt |
Powerpoint slides for review and comments of journal paper |
|
| |
06/08/2004 |
sw_prelim_f.ppt |
Powerpoint slides for doctoral preliminary exam |
|
| |
05/19/2004 |
result0519.pdf |
The instantenous velocity plots of the result on 05/18/2004. [better quality of figure] |
|
| |
05/18/2004 |
result0518.pdf |
The result of numerical simulation with swash data by LES
model of Suzuki. This is just start!! The results of velocity will be updated
soon. Input file(should be renamed
as swash04.dat) |
|
| |
05/04/2004 |
result0504.pdf |
Instanteneous quantities for horizontal & vertical velocity,
tuebulence component, shear stress, and turbulence kinetic energy. (compupwp0504.m,
plot_turb.m) |
|
| |
04/02/2004 |
swashT2.zip |
Zip file for the input of numerical models (pc version). |
|
| |
03/22/2004 |
profAnew_cinepak.avi |
Movie for hydrodynamic quntities (revised version of previous
movie). (a) Measuring position (b) Ensemble averaged water surface elevation
(c) Vertical sturcture of time varing horizontal velocity (d) Time-averaged
horizontal velocity (e) Bottom shear stresss. Solid line: using measured
shear velocity. Dashed line: estimation using ensmeble averaged horizontal
velocity. |
|
| |
03/17/2004 |
results0317.pdf |
Vertical sturcture of time varing horizontal velocity compared
with water surface elevation at the wave crest of location A. |
|
| |
03/17/2004 |
u_profA.avi |
Vertical sturcture of time varing horizontal velocity compared
with water surface elevation within one wave period. The Velocities and
elevations are ensemble averaged quantities. (plt_u_time.m) |
|
| |
03/16/2004 |
results0316.pdf |
Computation of Skewness and Kurtosis for water surface elevation.
(Matlab function: skewn_kurto.m by Sungwon) |
|
| |
03/15/2004 |
final_report_oc669.pdf |
Final report of OC669 |
|
| |
03/15/2004 |
final_pres1.pps |
Final presentation of OC669 with movie file (rbr2mov0.avi). |
|
| |
03/11/2004 |
results0311.pdf |
Cross-shore variation of water surface elevation and their
spectra from RBREAK2 and experiment (f = 0.01). |
|
| |
03/08/2004 |
results0308.pdf |
Comparison of swash experimental results and RBREAK2 results
with changing friction factor (=0.005 and 0.01). |
|
| |
03/03/2004 |
run3_t.pdf |
Results of RBREAK2 (test case: RUN3-T) |
|
| |
02/13/2004 |
report2.pdf |
Computation of bottom shear velocity, shear stress, and friction
factor |
|
| |
02/04/2004 |
report1.pdf |
Experimental setup, Wave Charateristics, Ensemble
averaged quantities(e.g. turbulence). |
|
| |
Date |
File |
Description |
|
| |
12/16/2004 |
AGU poster |
The poster of AGU Fall Meeting 04. |
|
| |
11/12/2004 |
bbt1112f.ppt |
Powerpoint slide file presented in brown bag seminar(11/12/2004). |
|
| |
10/13/2004 |
results1013.pdf |
Cross-shore variation of R-square value and RMS errors of
three different fitting. (jointfit1012.m) |
|
| |
10/12/2004 |
results1012.pdf |
Scatter plots of A(u) vs S(du/dt), S(dp/dx) vs S(du/dt) and
three different fitting (y = ax+b, y = cx, y =x) using all waves and 1/3
highest waves at each cross-shore location. Dots are 1/3 highest waves and
red open circles are the rest of waves. |
|
| |
10/07/2004 |
results1003.pdf |
Joint distributions of individual wave; asymmetry of horizontal
velocity, A(u), vs . skewness of du/dt, S(du/dt), A(u) vs S(dp/dx), and
S(du/dt) vs S(dp/dx). In " results0929.pdf ", three quatities have agreement with each other for entire waves
but individual waves are scattered in joint distribution. There are two
velocity data; u500 and u507 using different ADV. u500 was located in 5
cm and u507 in 1.7 cm from the bottom at the same cross-shore location as
pressure sensors (jointdist_irr1005.m). |
|
| |
10/05/2004 |
results0929.pdf |
4 times and 5 times larger peak frequency components of water
surface elevation, pressure, and ADV data were filtered out. Asymmetry and
skewness of velocity, acceleration, and pressure gradient were calculated
as Elgar et al (2001) suggested (pl_crss_var.m). |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|