ME 382 - Introduction to Mechanical Design
Sample Course Syllabus
Fall 1993
David Ullman, 212 Rogers, x2336
Bob Paasch, 318 Rogers, x4646
- Class hours:
- Lecture; MWF 11:30-12:20
Lab; Th 9:30-11:20 or
Th 11:30- 1:20 or
Th 2:30-4:20 or
Fri 2:30- 4:20
Course Objectives:
This course has four interwoven objectives:
- To learn about the process of design in order to generate better quality
designs in less time.
- To learn about the organization of design within a company.
- To learn how to be more creative in solving design problems.
- To learn how to design as part of a team activity.
To accomplish all of these goals simultaneously is not easy. To make things
more complicated, the only way to teach design is to have you create designs
to open-ended problems, problems with a large number of good solutions.
Thus, to accomplish all of these goals the course will be focused around a
design project.
Reading Material: The Mechanical Design Process, Ullman, McGraw Hill
Grading: Grading will be based on:
- 20% - individual design notebooks
- 25% - homework
- 15% - field test results
- 10% - Subjective Evaluation of Project
- 30% - product development file
- total 100%
Note that the last three items (55% of the grade) are based on the results
of a team project. Each of the graded items are described below.
Individual Design Notebooks: You are to keep a design notebook for use in
this course. This is to be a spiral bound notebook such as National 33-610
which has graph paper on the back of each lined sheet. All work concerning
the design project will be entered into this notebook. This includes all
sketches, notes, design ideas and homework. The homework you turn in each
week must be a xerox or carbon copy of that in the design notebook. Every
page in the notebook must be numbered at the beginning of the term. No pages
can be removed and each page must be dated and initialed when used. In other
words, everything you do on the project is included in the notebook. Each
notebook will be collected at the end of the term and graded on the number
of "quality entries" it contains. A quality entry is a significant
sketch or drawing of some aspect of the design; a listing of functions, ideas,
or other features; a table such as morphology or decision matrix; or a page of
text. Entries that are unintelligible are not "quality entries". The
grading will be:
- grade of 100% for 60 or more quality entries
- grade of 95% for 55-59
- grade of 90% for 50-54
- grade of 85% for 45-49
- grade of 80% for 40-44
- grade of 75% for 35-39
- grade of 70% for 30-34
- grade of 65% for 25-29
- grade of 60% for 20-24
- grade of 55% for <20
Homework: Due the Monday following the assignment at the beginning of
class (assignment for week 1 is due on Monday, Oct 4). Homework to be turned in
consists of xerox copies of the entries in your note book. The sequence of
events is that you read the material and do the assignment as part of your
record keeping in your design notebook. You turn in a copy of the
assignment on Monday and, during your lab on Thursday or Friday you discuss
the topics and reach team agreement on the results. Documentation of the
consensus becomes part of the team's Product Development File.
Field Test: The field test (design contest) will be held in the 10th
week. This will be a double elimination contest. The grading will be solely on
how your team places with first place receiving 100% and last place 60%.
Product Development File: This is a team produced file covering the
history of the design. Each team will keep a single Product Development File
in a loose leaf notebook. This file contains the team agreed to results of each
homework assignment. In other words, each team member will do the homework
individually in his/her personal notebook, then the team will come to
consensus on the assignment and enter this in the Product Development File.
Documents that will be assigned as homework and should be in the Product
Development File are:
- Problem Appraisal Phase
- Understanding the Problem
- 1. Description of Customers
- 2. Customer's Requirements
- 3. Weighting of Customer's Requirements
- 4. Competition's Benchmarks Versus Customer's
- Requirements
- 5. Engineering Requirements
- 6. Competition's Benchmarks Versus Engineering
- Requirements
- 7. Engineering Targets
- Planning the Project
- 8. Task Titles
- 9. Objectives of each Task
- 10. Personnel Required for Each Task
- 11. Time Required for Each Task
- 12. Schedule of Tasks
- Conceptual Design Phase
- Concept Generation
- 13. Functional Decomposition
- 14. Literature and Patent Search Process and Results
- 15. Function-Concept Mapping
- 16. Sketches of Overall Concepts
- Concept Evaluation
- 17. Technology Readiness Assessment
- 18. Go/no-go Screening
- 19. Decision Matrices to Determine Best Concepts
- 20. Analysis, Experiments and Models
- Product Design Phase
- Product Generation
- 21. Usable Off-the-Shelf Products
- 22. Shape Development Driven by Function
- 23. Material(s) Selection
- 24. Manufacturing Process(s) Selection
- Product Evaluation
- 25. Comparison to Engineering Requirements
- 26. Functional Changes Noted
- 27. Design for Assembly Evaluation
- 28. Cost Evaluation
- 29. Analysis, Experiments and Models Supporting
- Final Product Documentation
- 30. Layout Drawings
- 31. Detail Drawings of Manufactured Parts
- 32. Parts List (Bill of Materials)
- 33. Assembly Instructions
The file is to be maintained by the team in a loose leaf binder. This file,
when completed, is effectively a final report. It will be graded on
completeness and quality of both the design and the documentation itself.
Team Grading: To make grading of team produced material fair, the team
grades will be corrected for each student with a weighting factor. This
factor will be developed through each team member's confidential evaluation
of all members in the team. Each member of the team will evaluate every
member of the team (including themselves) for the percent of his/her
contribution to the project. The evaluations will be averaged by the
faculty to find each student's contribution and the weighting factor made
proportional to it. If there are, for example, three students in a team and
all the team members feel that each made the same contribution (33%), then
all will get the same grade. However, if the average rating shows that one
makes a 40% contribution, one a 25% contribution and the third a 35%
contribution then the grades will be corrected by the difference from 33%.
Thus, if the team grade on the Product Development File, for example, was
85% then the first student would get 92% (85+(40-33)), the second would get
77% (85+(25-33)) and the third 87%.
Schedule:
- Week 1 9/27 - 10/1
- Topics Covered:
- Goals of Course
- Understanding the Design Process
- Discussion of Resume Writing
- Other Goals:
- Establish course organization
- See video on earlier contests
- Reading: Chapters 1, 2 and 6
- Assignment:
- Write Resume (due 10/4, the following Monday)
- Fill in experience questionnaire
- Lab: Resume writing
- Week 2 10/4 - 10/8
- Topics Covered:
- Human Problem solving
- Team Dynamics
- Understanding the Problem (QFD method)
- Other goals: Form teams
- Reading: Chapters 3 and 7
- Assignment: Documents 1 - 7, Personality Type Exercise
- Lab: Human Problem Solving
- Visual Thinking
- Left-Right Brain
- Sketching
- Week 3 10/11 - 10/15
- Topics Covered:
- Project Planning
- Generating Design Concepts (Part 1)
- Reading: Chapters 8 and 9
- Assignment: Documents 8 - 14
- Lab: Kit handout
- Kit inventory
- Brainstorming
- Prototyping
- Week 4 10/18 - 10/22
- Topics Covered:
- Generating Design Concepts (Part 2)
- Ergonomics
- Concept Evaluation and Decision Making
- Reading: Chapters 4, 5 and 10
- Assignment: 15-20 (Concept prototype due in lab)
- Lab: Project work
- Week 5 10/25 - 10/29
- Topics Covered: Product Generation
- Reading: Chapter 11 and 12
- Assignment: Documents 21 - 24
- Lab: motors and gears
- Week 6 11/1 - 11/5
- Topics Covered:
- Reading: Chapter 13
- Assignment: 25 - 29
- Lab: AutoCAD demo
- Week 7 11/8 - 11/12
- Topics Covered:
- Other Goals: Approval to start building product
- Reading: Chapter 14
- Assignment: 30 - 33 (These assignments are done by the team and do not appear in the design notebooks)
- Lab: Lathe Demo
- Week 8 11/15 - 11/19
- Topics Covered: Product Evaluation
- Other Goals:
- Reading: none
- Assignment and lab: Build product
- Week 9 11/22 - 11/24 (Thanksgiving)
- Topics Covered: Product Evaluation
- Other Goals:
- Reading: none
- Assignment and lab: Build product
- Week 10 11/29 - 12/3
- Topics Covered:
- Parameter and Tolerance Design
- see film "Gizmo"
- Reading: none
- Assignment:
- Products impounded at 12:00 noon December 1
- Field Test Product Evening of December 1 (7:00 PM in Milam Auditorium)
- Turn in Notebooks and Product Development File by 5:00 Friday December 3
- Write a one page or more evaluation of your design and your contest experience as your final entry in the design notebook.
- Lab: clean up shop
Some more information about ME 382
Back to David G. Ullman's
Home Page