I just wondered why the UAI conferences don't use a double-blind review
process (i.e. both the author(s) as well as the reviewers are anonymous
during the reviewing)? Although it would mean a slight increase in paper
work for the organisation committee, it would also give the appearance of
higher professionalism throughout the community.
(No, this is not about me being rejected and wanting to blame someone else,
or whatever. It is simply the observation that many other highly competitive
arenas, such as the IJCAI, have introduced double-blind reviews a long time
ago...)
Best regards
Helge Langseth
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 13 2001 - 21:10:16 PST