As long as we seem to be voting... I think "double blind" reviewing is both
a pain, and also a bit of a fraud. I think it more useful to put one's
efforts into the substance of one's papers (instead of concealing one's
identity) and for reviewers to put their efforts into making constructive
and useful comments. No doubt there are occasions on which personalities
intrude. But my feeling is that that's pretty rare.
Henry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 15 2001 - 09:51:20 PST